This sounds like an easy question.
Posted on November 13, by Scott Alexander I. Medieval Icelandic crime victims would sell the right to pursue a perpetrator to the highest bidder. Somali judges compete on the free market; those who give bad verdicts get a reputation that drives away future customers.
Law is a public good. If you steal my gold, I have some interest in catching you and taking it back, but no more than I do in catching some other poor shmuck and taking his gold.
This is the classic situation where economists usually recommend government intervention. Maybe you With utilitarianism on the mind essay in an area like Somalia or medieval Ireland without a strong centralized government.
Gypsies living scattered in foreign countries have generally wanted to run their own communities by their own rules. But something does stop them from trying to enforce them: So the Vlach Rom — Romanian Gypsies — organize courts called kris which enforce their sentences with threat of banishment from the community.
Kris courts can declare the worst offenders polluted, ensuring their speedy ostracization from Gypsy society. And since non-Gypsies are polluted by default, the possibility of ostracism and forced integration into non-Gypsy society will seem intolerable: The effectiveness of that threat [of ostracism] depends on how easily the exiled gypsy can function outside of his community.
It follows that they are all polluted, unclean, carriers of a contagious disease, people whom no Rom in his right mind would willingly choose to associate with; when and if such association is unavoidable it must be taken with great care.
The gypsy view of gaije, reinforced by the gaije view of gypsies as uneducated and illiterate thieves and swindlers, eliminates the exit option and so empowers the kris to enforce gypsy law by the threat of exclusion from the only tolerable human society.
Amish also live under the authority of a foreign culture and have settled on a similar system, with a twist. The basic unit of Amish society is the church congregation; Amish settlements big enough to support multiple churches will have many congregations mixed together.
Amish congregations are nominally democratic, but in practice Friedman calls them dictatorship-like because everyone votes the way the bishop wants.
This makes it a rare remaining example of a polycentric legal system outside anarcho-capitalist fantasies or Too Like The Lightning: Such a system can be viewed as a competitive market for legal rules, constrained, like other competitive markets, to produce about the product that the customers want.
Competitive dictatorship is the mechanism we routinely use to control hotels and restaurants; the customers have no vote on what color the walls are painted or what is on the menu, but an absolute vote on which one they patronize.
They do encounter the same problem as the Gypsies: The Amish have some internal mechanisms to prevent this: Of course, you can still leave the Amish community and go join broader American society.
But have you seen broader American society? There were no public prosecutors; anyone who felt like it could bring a criminal to court and start prosecuting him, but if nobody felt like it then the crime remained unpunished.
Prosecuting took a lot of time and money and was generally a thankless task. The exotic anarcho-capitalist part comes in as English civil society creates its own structures to work around these limitations. Merchants, landowners, and other people with wealth banded together in mutual-protection-insurance-groups.
Everyone in the group would pay a fixed amount yearly, and if one of them got robbed the group would use the money to hire a prosecutor to try the criminal.
Group members would publish their names in the newspaper to help inform thieves whom it was a bad idea to rob. Once a trial was underway, prosecutors would usually cut a deal: The size of the bribe would vary based on how much the offender could pay, the extent of their crime, and the facts of the case and therefore the likelihood of the magistrate choosing hanging vs.
This not only helped tailor the punishment more precisely to the crime, but helped defer the cost of prosecution: What both modern and contemporary commentators seem to have missed is that, however corrupt such arrangements might be from a legal standpoint, they helped solve the fundamental problem of private prosecution.
The possibility of compounding provided an incentive to prosecute-it converted the system into something more like a civil system, where a victim sues in the hope of collecting money damages. And while compounding might save the criminal from the noose, he did not get off scott free.Act and Rule Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. Like other forms of consequentialism, its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their caninariojana.com specifically, the only effects of actions that are relevant are the good and bad results that they produce.
John Stuart Mill (—) John Stuart Mill () profoundly influenced the shape of nineteenth century British thought and political discourse. (You might want to read some disclaimers.). Utilitarianism, for all the unfortunate connotations of the word (which conjures up images of factories, high-rise buildings and all things ugly-but-functional), is an ethical system of great elegance and beauty.
Jeremy Bentham (/ ˈ b ɛ n θ ə m /; 15 February [O.S. 4 February ] – 6 June ) was an English philosopher, jurist, and social reformer regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism..
Bentham defined as the "fundamental axiom" of his philosophy the principle that "it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong". Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? [Michael J. Sandel] on caninariojana.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
For Michael Sandel, justice is not a spectator sport, The Nation 's reviewer of Justice remarked. In his acclaimed book―based on his legendary Harvard course―Sandel offers a rare education in thinking through the complicated issues and controversies we face in public life today.
A generation later, utilitarianism found its most effective exponent in John Stuart caninariojana.com by his father, the philosopher James Mill, on strictly Benthamite principles, Mill devoted his life to the defence and promotion of the general caninariojana.com the help his long-time companion Harriet Taylor, Mill became a powerful champion of lofty moral and social ideals.